** The following is an interview with a scientist who has shown that reliance on fossil fuels is a choice not a necessity. Imagine converting all our existing commercial vehicles and trucks for short-term run on hydrogen. No fuel cell, hybrid no, no bullshit.
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Please Link to Me
25 users commented in " Hydrogen -Who’s Killing the Hydrogen Car? "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackFirst of all the main problem with hydrogen car is that they emit water. This could be a huge problem to the ecosystem of deserts if everyone in lets say Arizona had a hydrogen car they would be emitting so much water that they could actually change the ecosystem of the desert. Which in turn would kill a lot of biomass.
How does the hydrogen affect the engine and systems like cylinder walls, plugs, valves, etc. Any corrosion/oxidization issues, I assume the exhaust would have to be made of stainless steel
Can’t the oxygen be donated?
@Vulcan750L Well, gasoline is near its end. Electric should be the way to go I assume. Electric is much more cheaper and the most important thing, environmentally friendly. If they develop better, more persistent batteries. It would probably be they rebirth of electric power vehicles.
@gurra1351
If Hydrogen uses more energy than it replaces, and gasoline and electric are more efficient alternatives than Hydrogen, then what is the point of switching to Hydrogen?
Now factor in the greater cost and complexity and the need to build a whole new infrastructure to support hydrogen distribution. Hydrogen is an utterly stupid way to go.
These guys were set to start making kits a few years back but from what I remember the government confiscated alot of their stuff having to do with the hydride. From what I understand they have it worked out now and on their website they are set to start manufacturing sometime this year. I think the cost is about $10000 for the kit but it also includes the solar powered hydrogen machine.
I just saw on the news today they have discovered a new storage method. Maybe that will help this along
Does someone knows if mr. Lazar still alive and if it is possible to get in contact with him !? I would realy love to create comparative project like this one were i live.
This is a good start, but he did say it consumes a lot of electricity. He also mentioned you need platinum, or some kind of non-corrosive metal for the electrodes, very expensive. Solar energy isn’t cheap to set up. Photovoltaic panels are very expensive.
The expense for the apparatus is very high. Plus you need electricity you make a fuel to make electricity, remember you can never get 100% efficiency. So in the end, electrolysis at this stage is not viable. Hope for the future though.
Bob Lzar Please post these plans online so we can revolt against the oil companies and Illuminati. Please bob It’s all getting worst. Now more than ever.
@Vulcan750L Well, I like both electric and hydrogen. But if there perhaps is more energy produced than the customers use, then it’s shouldn’t be electric inefficient.
I’ve been watching these guys for years… I’m waiting for the launch…. My f-150 craves this… I hope they can overcome the lithium-6 deuteride issue. The rest of the system conversion is much like converting to propane I think… minus the converter….
It’s almost as if the Rockerfellers or Duponts want t ohave their own material which they could patent so you have to pay them much like nylon did to hemp. Then I see that is happening with nanotechnology as a British company claims to be the first to do what you have been doing for ages:
New Hydrogen Technology – A fuel that uses nanotechnology to safely store hydrogen in tiny microbeads. UK based business Cella Energy has developed the potentially revolutionary……. There you go!
wow this is so interesting how something like this exist but yet we continue to import millions of barrels of oil per day
if we run cars on water there wil definitly be war over Canada for water
Sounds like you have have to expend energy to make the hydride, then you have to expend more energy to make the hydrogen. Then you have to expend more energy to get the hydride to release the hydrogen. Sounds every energy inefficient. How is this a viable way of powering our cars?
Better off just getting an electric car. Much more energy efficient, less complicated, and less of a hassle.
@idontcare80
I agree…nothing delivers the bang like fossil fuel.
I was only using Obama as an example of all the scientifically ignorant politicians.
Many politicians pushed Ethanol and now we know its outcome…it caused food shortages. Nothing can be done in a vacuum and there are always unanticipated consequences. Another interesting aspect about Ethanol that is little known is that it carries less energy per gallon than gasoline. 76 kBTU vs 116 kBTU. So its fuel economy is much weaker.
@SeaWolfe59 I believe in alternative energy, just not hydrogen. In the future there might be a way to make it practical, but I haven’t seen anything showing much promise of that.
Also, I’ve known people who live quite normally completely off the grid (except for their cars), it is something that’s possible to do right now. And I don’t know what Obama has to do with any of this, but most politicians (by far) are very ignorant when it comes to science and technology and that’s a very bad thing.
@idontcare80
Ive run some numbers on area needed and, I agree, to run our cars and homes the way we do now would take a very large array of PVs. And I, like you, am skeptical of all the talk about alternate energy sources. People have been duped into thinking ethanol is the same as gasoline, or PVs are as good as fossil fuels. Theres a lot of ignorance and misinformation flying around and politicians are complicit. Funny part is a guy like Obama couldnt pass a 9th grade science test.
@SeaWolfe59 I don’t know why storing it is even relevant, cars are used daily by the vast majority of people. The energy needed to make hydrogen could come from PVs, but the area of PVs needed to charge an EV is already quite large. Using solar energy to make hydrogen to power a car would require an even larger area of PVs.
@rockshandify Your retarded go have a donut and stay off the net.
@Dorisequador What the fuck are you talking about? Unlimited power?…. Perpetual motion??? IDIOT
@partydavo fck money, are you kidding? you think this technologies not worth anything u think there arnt financial benefis to this echolog? there would be
@farufon I appreciate your video thanks…
@farufon How is the power output compared to gasoline, in your corvette v8? were there major modifications needed to the fuel injection system or timing etc???
@idontcare80
Im not defending some of the things being said here so dont get me wrong. But I do want to comment that storing energy in batteries is ok for short term storage… but hydrogen can be stored long term without the inevitable energy loss (loss of charge) problematic with batteries.
As for where the energy will come from, I suppose an array of solar panels running all day every day might be sufficient to accumulate enough hydrogen, but, I havent run the numbers to see. Maybe not.
Leave A Reply